Caitlin Clark Was ROBBED of being Unanimous ROTY, Famous TV Anchors and Fans Destroyed WNBA Voting
Caitlin Clark Was ROBBED of Unanimous ROTY: Famous TV Anchors and Fans React to WNBA Voting
Caitlin Clark fell just one vote short of being unanimously named WNBA Rookie of the Year, igniting a wave of controversy in the sports world. When NFL legend Shannon Sharpe voiced his opinion on why Clark outshines Angel Reese, the basketball community erupted. “I don’t understand how you come to the conclusion that she wasn’t unanimous,” Sharpe said, highlighting Clark’s role in leading her team to the playoffs, a feat the Indiana Fever hadn’t accomplished since 2016 or 2017. Out of 67 votes cast, Clark received 66, with the lone vote going to Angel Reese.
Sharpe’s passionate defense of Clark raises the question: What made him so fired up? Before delving deeper, let’s not forget to subscribe to the channel! In the 2024 WNBA season, Clark averaged an impressive 19.2 points, 5.7 rebounds, and 8.4 assists per game. However, her statistics only tell part of the story. Her individual performances were phenomenal, and the most compelling aspect of her rookie season was how the Fever began to gel around her.
Clark didn’t just play; she transformed the Fever, who had been absent from the playoffs since 2016. They clinched the sixth seed with a record of 20-20, which is quite an achievement. But every hero needs a rival, and that rival was Angel Reese. Standing at 6’3″, the Chicago Sky forward made her mark, averaging a double-double with 13.6 points and a league-leading 13.1 rebounds per game—an impressive accomplishment for any rookie, but not quite on par with Caitlin Clark.
As the season progressed, fans witnessed two rising stars redefining what it means to be a WNBA player. Then came the moment everyone was waiting for: the Rookie of the Year vote. Of the 67 votes, Clark received 66, while Reese garnered just one, sparking a firestorm of controversy. Amidst the chaos, one voice stood out: Sharpe’s.
“Let’s not get into it,” he warned, hinting that the aftermath of the playoffs led to a drop in attendance and viewership when the Fever were eliminated. His comments sparked a debate about whether Clark’s impact was greater than her on-court performance. The numbers are telling: fan interest plummeted once the Fever were out of contention.
The conversation intensified with ESPN analyst Andrea Carter adding fuel to the fire. “We would love for the WNBA to make voting public,” she said, arguing that the anonymous nature of the voting process should be reconsidered. “If you were the person who cast the one vote for Reese, you should stand by it and reveal yourself.” Carter’s call for transparency ignited discussions about whether WNBA voting should be public like it is in the NBA. Speculation swirled around the identity of the mysterious voter who chose Reese over Clark.
“Caitlin Clark is box office,” Sharpe insisted. “Instead of giving her credit, you all tried to shift the focus.” He emphatically declared that Clark deserved to be the unanimous Rookie of the Year, noting that she not only broke rookie records but also shattered league records set by seasoned veterans with years of experience.
As the dust settled on this historic rookie season, lingering questions remain: Will Clark continue her meteoric rise? Can Reese evolve her game to challenge for the top spot? And how will this rivalry shape the future of the WNBA? One thing is certain: the league will never be the same, thanks to Caitlin Clark and Angel Reese.
Whether you love them or hate them, you can’t ignore the impact of these two rookies who have rewritten the rule book. As a new season approaches, fans and critics alike are on the edge of their seats. What are your thoughts on this snub? Was the lone vote for Angel Reese justified, or did Caitlin Clark get robbed of a unanimous selection? Let us know in the comments, and thanks for watching! Don’t forget to like and subscribe for more updates on the WNBA.
